PA Media have shared what they know from Newcastle about Sandro Tonali's injury

Midfielder Sandro Tonali was conspicuous by his absence as Newcastle trained on Monday morning ahead of Tuesday night’s Champions League clash with Jose Mourinho’s Benfica.

The 25-year-old Italy international did not take part in the open section of the session in front of the cameras at the club’s Darsley Park base.

Tonali, a £55million signing from AC Milan during the summer of 2003, was replaced by Jacob Ramsey with 20 minutes of Saturday’s 2-1 Premier League defeat at Brighton remaining.

The Italian has become a key member of Eddie Howe’s midfield alongside Brazilians Bruno Guimaraes and Joelinton since returning from his 10-month ban for gambling offences in August last year.

Tonali, a Carabao Cup winner with the Magpies in March, played all but a few minutes for his country in their World Cup qualifying victories over Estonia and Israel during the last international break.

Head coach Howe will hope to have him at his disposal on Tuesday evening as Newcastle attempt to add to the three points they collected from a 4-0 victory over Union Saint-Gilloise in Brussels earlier this month after losing their opening fixture to Barcelona at St James’ Park.

Their new Sandro Tonali: Newcastle already have "England's next superstar"

Newcastle have an immense talent working his way toward superstardom.

ByAngus Sinclair Oct 14, 2025

Álvaro Pacheco rescinde com Vitória de Guimarães e se aproxima de ser anunciado pelo Vasco

MatériaMais Notícias

Álvaro Pacheco não é mais técnico do Vitória de Guimarães. O treinador rescindiu o contrato em comum acordo com o clube português. Com isso, o futuro comandante do Vasco tem o caminho livre para acertar os últimos detalhes e anunciado pelo Cruz-Maltino nos próximos dias. A informação foi publicada primeiramente pelo canal “Atenção, Vascaínos” e confirmada pelo Lance!.

continua após a publicidadeRelacionadasVascoVasco dá passo importante para a reforma de São JanuárioVasco15/05/2024VascoAndrey Santos, ex-Vasco, marca primeiro gol na Europa e garante vitória do Strasbourg em clássico na FrançaVasco14/05/2024FinançasPhilippe Coutinho no Brasil? Veja quanto meia recebe no QatarFinanças14/05/2024

➡️Tudo sobre o Gigante agora no WhatsApp. Siga o nosso canal Lance! Vasco

➡️ A boa do Lance!Betting: vamos dobrar seu primeiro depósito, até R$200! Basta abrir sua conta e tá na mão!

Segundo informações apuradas pelo Lance! junto de Álvaro Pacheco chegarão os auxiliares Pedro Valdemar Teixeira, Bruno Pinto e José Teixeira, além do preparador físico Rui Lemos. Os preparadores de goleiros ficam no Vitória de Guimarães.

Álvaro Pacheco já não comandou o treino do Vitória de Guimarães nesta quarta-feira (15). Em entrevista coletiva, o presidente do clube português falou sobre o assunto.

continua após a publicidade

O treinador sai a custo zero porque, perante um treinador que a 3 dias do fim da temporada pretende sair, o clube não pode ficar refém de uma situação destas. Temos de ter alguém no comando que se preocupe


afirmou António Miguel Cardoso, presidente do Vitória de Guimarães

Álvaro Pacheco não tem prevista para chegar ao Brasil. A expectativa é de que o futuro técnico do Vasco desembarque no Rio de Janeiro na próxima semana. No entanto, não há impeditivo para que o treinador português chegue para assistir o “Clássico dos Milhões” entre Vasco e Flamengo.

De todo modo, o Vasco ainda será comandado por Rafael Paiva contra o Flamengo. O técnico interino conquistou sua primeira vitória na última rodada, quando o Cruz-Maltino superou o Vitória por 2 a 1, em São Januário.

continua após a publicidade

Vasco e Flamengo se enfrentam neste sábado (18), às 21h, no Maracanã. A partida é válida pela sétima rodada do Brasileirão.

Tudo sobre

Álvaro PachecoVascoVitória de Guimarães

Rockies Promote Warren Schaeffer to Full-Time Manager for 2026 Season

After taking over as interim manager following the Rockies firing Bud Black mid-season, Colorado is promoting Warren Schaeffer as the full-time manager for the 2026 season. The team announced the decision on Monday afternoon.

Schaeffer took over in May and posted a 36–86 record as interim manager with the Rockies this year. Despite the unfortunate outcome of the season, the Rockies are ready to give Schaeffer a fresh slate next year.

“We’re confident Warren is the right person to lead our club moving forward,” Rockies president of baseball operations Paul DePodesta said in a statement. “He has established strong relationships with our players, understands the culture of this franchise and embodies the energy and work ethic we want on and off the field.”

A couple Rockies players endorsed Schaeffer after the season for him to return in the future, including outfielder Jordan Beck.

“I like what he’s changed; I like what he brings to the table,” Beck said in September, via CBS Sports. “There is real accountability and there is true conversation. He makes guys feel really comfortable and prepared, and that’s important for a young team.”

The 40-year-old Schaeffer was promoted to the major leagues for the 2023 season as he was hired as the Rockies’ third base and infield coach. Before coming to majors, Schaeffer worked 10 years coaching and managing in the minor leagues.

خاص | الزمالك يحدد سعر بيع حسام عبد المجيد للموافقة على رحيله

يواصل نادي الزمالك دراسة ملف الراحلين خلال فترة الانتقالات الشتوية المقبلة، في ظل تلقي عدد من لاعبي الفريق اهتمامًا خارجيًا من أندية أوروبية وعربية قبل انطلاق يناير 2026.

ويأتي حسام عبد المجيد، مدافع الفريق الشاب، ضمن أكثر الأسماء التي تحظى بمتابعة واسعة، خاصة بعد بروز اسمه مع الزمالك ومنتخب مصر الأول خلال الأشهر الماضية.

وخرج الإعلامي هاني حتحوت وكشف عن حديث من قبل المدافع والذي أكد أنه قريب من الرحيل في شهر يناير المقبل إلى أوروبا.

اقرأ أيضًا.. خاص | “قرض حسن” يحل مشاكل الزمالك مع اللاعبين الأجانب مؤقتًا

وعلم بطولات من مصادره داخل النادي أن الزمالك وضع شروطًا واضحة للموافقة على احتراف اللاعب، رغم عدم وصول أي عروض رسمية حتى هذه اللحظة، مع اهتمام فرق برتغالية وروسية وفرنسية بضم المدافع.

وأوضح المصدر أن إدارة الزمالك لا تمانع خروج اللاعب للاحتراف الخارجي، لكنها تريد ضمان استفادة النادي ماليًا من الصفقة، خصوصًا في ظل ارتباطه بعقد يمتد حتى يونيو 2027.

وأشار المصدر إلى أن النادي لن يقف في طريق مستقبل حسام عبد المجيد حال تلقيه عرضًا مناسبًا من أوروبا، خاصة بعد التطور الكبير الذي ظهر به اللاعب خلال الفترة الأخيرة.

وأكدت المصادر أن الزمالك حدد سعرًا مبدئيًا للموافقة على رحيل مدافعه، بحيث لا يقل العرض القادم عن 4 ملايين دولار ليتم السماح له بالرحيل في الميركاتو الشتوي.

ويأتي هذا التوجه من إدارة الزمالك في إطار رغبتها في الحفاظ على العناصر الأساسية، مع تحقيق استفادة مالية مناسبة تساهم في دعم الفريق وتوفير موارد لصفقات يناير المقبلة.

Giants Nearing Deal to Name Top SEC Baseball Coach Manager

The Giants are reportedly close to hiring a new manager—and he will potentially be an unorthodox one.

San Francisco is nearing a deal to hire Tennessee coach Tony Vitello as its new manager, according to a Saturday afternoon report from Andrew Baggarly, Brittany Ghiroli and Ken Rosenthal of . Vitello would replace Bob Melvin, who the Giants fired after an 81–81 season.

The 47-year-old St. Louis native has never worked in Major League Baseball in any form or fashion. He has served as the Volunteers' coach since 2018; he previously worked as an assistant for Missouri, TCU and Arkansas.

With Tennessee, Vitello won a national championship in 2024 and advanced to three College World Series. The brassy, bombastic coach would depart the Volunteers with a career record of 341–131 in eight seasons.

San Francisco has not made the playoffs since its out-of-nowhere 107-win season in 2021, which ended with a loss to the Dodgers in the National League Division Series.

Anthony Rizzo's Wedding Ring Miraculously Found at Bottom of Lake Michigan

Apparently if you are going to lose one of your valuables in a body of water, Lake Michigan is the place to do it.

released a feature on Chicago scuba diver Yohei Yamada Tuesday, who has carved a niche of diving into Lake Michigan to retrieve lost items when called upon. He's successfully recovered everything from cellphones to wallets and even a $30,000 Rolex watch.

Amid an endless trove of lost items, potentially the most unique is former Cubs star Anthony Rizzo's wedding ring.

“Rizzo had lost weight and washed his hands in his boat. He shook them dry, and the ring flew off,” Yamada said via 's Mack Liederman. “Somebody gave him my number.”

Liederman said that the Rizzos gave Yamada a few $100 bills as a generous tip for the successful dive. In Chicago's championship season in 2016, Rizzo led the team with 109 RBIs and smacked 32 home runs over the regular season. He hit three homers in the postseason, including one in Game 6 of the World Series which the Cubs won to force a series- and championship-clinching Game 7.

He played for the Cubs for four more full seasons before he was traded to the Yankees at the deadline in '21. The Yankees declined his $17 million option for the 2025 season and paid him a $6 million buyout that made him a free agent.

Red Sox Walk-Off Win Showcases Incredible Stat While Wearing Green Monster Uniforms

The Red Sox may want to consider wearing their Green Monster-themed City Connect uniforms on a full-time basis.

When shortstop Trevor Story punched a ground ball through the infield to drive in the winning run for a 2-1 victory over the Marlins on Friday night, it marked Boston's fifth walk-off win wearing their green uniforms which were just released this season.

The thrilling victory was Boston's 10th walk-off win of the year with half of those coming in their Fenway Greens. Considering they only wear the special uniform during Friday home games, that's a pretty remarkable feat. Plus, each game the Red Sox have won donning the green has come on a walk-off.

After the close win in the series opener against the Marlins, the Red Sox advanced to 67-56 on the year, currently 4.5 games back of the Blue Jays who hold the lead in the AL East. They are in wild-card position, though, currently two games up on the Yankees who hold the final spot and three games in front of the Guardians who sit as the first team out.

Down the stretch, maybe they should bend the rules and rock the Fenway Greens more often.

Jaydev Unadkat transcends reputation in season of spontaneity and long spells

After a record-breaking season that ended with a Ranji title, Unadkat has made a legitimate case for a Test comeback

Shashank Kishore in Rajkot14-Mar-2020Jaydev Unadkat is big on focusing on the “small aspects”. Some of these revolve around life philosophies and finding happiness in the intangibles. An avid reader, he jots down notes and tries to incorporate lessons or insights at team meetings whenever he comes across something he believes is “interesting”. As far as Saurashtra’s cricket team goes, he’s equivalent to a CEO.One such insight that left a lasting impression on Unadkat during the 2019-20 Ranji Trophy season was that decisions made in a blink – snap judgments, essentially – can also be very good. He was captivated by what he read in , by Malcolm Gladwell. The book is a series of anecdotes and psychological case studies that explore impulsive decision-making. It also delves into the subconscious mind. Little would Unadkat have realised when he read the book recently that he’d apply the lessons in the Ranji Trophy final, to deliver the knockout blow to Bengal.

“I would say I am at my peak. I’ve now got a lot of options of getting a wicket, which is always the thing a bowler looks for. You can’t be a one-trick pony.”Jaydev Unadkat

Bengal had just lost the huge wicket of Anustup Majumdar, but had the capable Akash Deep join the well-set Arnab Nandi. The lead was just 64 runs away, and Bengal’s batting stretches until No. 10. In the semi-finals, Deep had salvaged Bengal from a hopeless situation by making 44, lending support to Majumdar against a competent Karnataka attack. Saurashtra were slight, but by no means outright, favourites. It’s at this point that Unadkat brought out his “blink” moment.Deep had just been beaten, and Avi Barot, the wicketkeeper, had missed with a shy at the stumps. Unadkat was alert to the possibility of the throw missing, and had stayed where he was on his follow-through to collect the ball. Then he noticed Deep’s feet were outside the crease, and threw down the stumps. The split-second decision told you of his match awareness. The decision went upstairs and Deep was gone to what you could only call a brain fade.”To have good judgement, you need that experience to make crucial decisions in day-to-day situations,” Unadkat explains. “I have the habit of talking to the boys about such stuff, and how we can incorporate learnings from what we read or see into cricket. Most of my chats at team meetings or general pep talks revolve around life philosophies, equating it to cricket, and not by directly giving a cricket example. It helped bring a different flavour to our team meetings, it got players thinking.”As perfectly as the “blink” moment was executed, Unadkat was slightly itchy. That he’d come into the final with 65 wickets, delivering wicket-taking spells for fun. On all kinds of surfaces, with old and new ball. And when it mattered the most, he had bowled over 35 wicketless overs, had DRS calls overturn potential wickets, including the crucial one of Wriddhiman Saha early on the fourth day. The game was slipping away, but he was drawing on his reserves.”I got 65-odd wickets in 15 innings, more than four wickets per innings, and after that, everybody wanted me to strike when the team needed the most,” Unadkat says. “But I was wicketless for 30 overs. Till Thursday evening, I kept thinking that it will be that one ball which can get the crucial breakthrough. I knew if I could get that one wicket, it would mean a lot more than those previous wickets.”Chetan Sakariya started well. That first over [on the fifth day] gave us the belief that it will not be easy. I was telling myself that if I could challenge myself and bowl the ball of the season, it will help the team immensely. I was telling that to myself before every single delivery. I said that to myself before getting Anustup out.”It needed a sensational delivery to dismiss Majumdar. Bowling from around the wicket, Unadkat made the ball talk. He got one to pitch on a length outside off and jag back in sharply – a hint of reverse. The ball didn’t lose much pace off the pitch, Majumdar looked to play across the line – perhaps not the best split-second decision – and before he’d realised, the ball had thudded into his pads and the umpire had raised his finger. He was stone dead, and a polite request for a review only delayed the inevitable.”The dream season could only have been special if you actually win the title,” Unadkat says. “At the end, we had had three defeats in finals and it doesn’t feel good. It is a long season where you have put your blood and sweat. This season, I have given everything mentally and physically. I wouldn’t have enjoyed any sort of record if I hadn’t won. I wanted to do it one more time for my team. I wanted to prove I’m not just someone whose numbers are looked at only when IPL auctions come up.”

“I don’t want to end it here. Yes we have won the trophy and I am the happiest captain in the world right now, but I still want this phase to keep going on and on for me. I want to keep going and leave no stone unturned.”Jaydev Unadkat

At this point, Unadkat is asked what the turning point was in the game. In a game that was decided on the basis of the first-innings lead, there were many. The Cheteshwar Pujara-Arpit Vasavada partnership, Saha’s reprieve through DRS, Manoj Tiwary’s dismissal, Majumdar’s wicket – it was that kind of a game. It fluctuated wildly one way, then swung back on even scales, then turned the other way, and eventually when it looked even again, Unadkat grabbed the game by it’s collar and saw Saurashtra home, just like he had done in the semi-finals when it appeared as if Gujarat might end up doing the unthinkable.”Look, the Ranji Trophy is not just series played among players. A lot of families and former players who feel for the team are involved. I got a lot of messages from people who had that belief that I can do it for the team,” Unadkat says. “Those messages worked for us. We talked about it in the morning, that there was one twist left. I told our boys that ‘this is our ground and we are going to make it count.’ We did believe there was something left for us in the game and we came out with that mindset and that did the trick for us.”BCCIAfter the kind of season he’s had, it’s only natural to talk of the next goal. Perhaps an India comeback?Think Unadkat, and invariably it’s the shorter formats that come to mind, largely because of the IPL. But over the years, he has shown there’s much more to his bowling than just delivering four overs game after game in T20. For starters, he has increased his pace, can sustain his intensity through the day, and not just merely over his first spell. He’s also added the extra dimension of reverse swing, the kind Zaheer Khan made famous. Remember the around-the-wicket angle to the right-handers at his peak?”It is the best I’ve bowled, am at my peak for sure,” Unadkat says. “It’s not just about taking those wickets, but how well I am recovering game after game, how [much] fitter I am feeling. How I am bowling on a fifth day with an old ball. Those reveal a lot of things, much more than numbers or wickets I take. So in terms of those things, I would say I am at my peak. I’ve now got a lot of options of getting a wicket, which is always the thing a bowler looks for. You can’t be a one-trick pony, I have been trying to work on it. Consistency is to take wickets, and for that you have to find ways. Going through the season, fine-tuning things, changing fitness routines have all helped me be what I am.”All of this means Unadkat has definitely pitched for a Test recall too, 10 years after his infamous debut at Centurion, where his most memorable moment was when he was asked whom he wanted his Test cap from, between Sachin Tendulkar, VVS Laxman and Rahul Dravid. He went wicketless, conceded 101 runs in 26 overs, and hasn’t been discussed for a Test berth since. While India’s next Test is eight months away, Unadkat has quietly put the ball back in the selectors’ court. And in Rajkot, they were all watching keenly. In a rare acknowledgment in public from a chief selector, Sunil Joshi even tweeted his appreciation for Unadkat. Does this all then mean he’s slowly building up hope for a comeback?”I have been working harder than many guys, as hard as any other cricketer in the country to earn my rewards,” he says. “It was not just the IPL on my mind at any time. Yes there was auction happening and people were talking just about that but this was something I really wanted to achieve [Ranji Trophy title]. I wanted to do it for the team, I wanted to do it for myself. I wanted to prove to myself that I don’t want to play the game for something other than cricket. I started playing this game because I was so passionate about it.”I have still got that hunger to make a comeback. The hunger has been stronger than this and that actually kept me going throughout the season. To be honest, it was challenging to physically survive the season. Bowling those long spells as a fast bowler in almost every game. But as I said, the hunger is more than ever before. I just want to keep this phase going. I don’t want to end it here. Yes we have won the trophy and I am the happiest captain in the world right now, but I still want this phase to keep going on and on for me. I want to keep going and leave no stone unturned.”How does he compare this with other achievements in his career?”If you ask me about the emotional quotient this is right at the top with everything else,” Unadkat says. “This is the moment of my career. It has never gotten bigger than this. Not just my achievement, but my state’s achievement. This team has been working really hard. People who have played for Saurashtra in the past have been wanting this trophy to come home. We have had a glorious cricketing legacy to carry as well. Maybe we just did not have the team 10 years [ago]. The team has come a long way, playing a lot of finals. Like I said it, right up there.”

Anti-establishment fighter whose statistics defy belief

Charlie Parker was a giant of county game who took 3278 first-class wickets – but only once played for England

Paul Edwards28-Apr-2020 Odd Men In, “The Boxer” – Simon and GarfunkelThe number of first-class matches played in England has declined so markedly in the last half-century that some records stand like monuments from antiquity. Likewise a few giants of the past have become shadowy figures, their achievements mentioned by current historians but seldom properly investigated. What might be said, for example, about the third-most successful bowler in the game’s history, a slow-medium left-arm spinner who took 3278 first-class wickets in 635 matches but bowled in just one innings of Test cricket? Well, for a start do not be fooled by his three faintly distinguished first names: Charles Warrington Leonard; or by his fine reputation as a golfer; or by the fact that he was born in Prestbury, Gloucestershire, and died in Cranleigh, Surrey, both of them apparently affluent locations. Charlie Parker was the son of a general labourer, an admirer of the Russian Revolution and a gut radical who, in 1929, nearly stuck one on Pelham Warner, the former England captain and an epitome of his country’s cricketing establishment.Immediately there is a danger that our subject’s fondness for communism, if not pugilism, will overshadow an appreciation of his skills. (This is not a frequent hazard for students of English county cricket.) Let us therefore allow Grahame Parker, Gloucestershire’s historian and someone who played with his namesake for three seasons in the 1930s, to give us a picture of Charlie in his pomp:”Lithe and over six feet tall, he would glide through a day’s bowling with unbuttoned shirt sleeves flapping about his wrists, always with a cap pulled down at a rakish angle over his right eye and a smooth effortless rhythm that did not change as the overs passed. His was a classic action – left arm hidden behind the body as he approached the wicket, brought over fully extended at the moment of delivery in a lazy circular arc that defied analysis from the other end.”ALSO READ: Odd Men In: Ian FolleyBut our observant historian can have seen Parker only after he started bowling spin in 1919. He had joined Gloucestershire in 1903 as a left-arm seamer and for over a decade he left the twirling to George Dennett, a bowler who picked up a mere 2147 first-class wickets in his 19 English summers. Before that first post-war season, however, the 36-year-old Parker informed officials at Gloucestershire – negotiation was rarely his style – that he would be turning to spin. So began a decade or so in which Parker was became one of the finest cricketers in the world, an achievement which RC Robertson-Glasgow (“Crusoe”) assessed in his inimitable style: “On a sticky wicket…[Parker] was the greatest bowler I have seen; for, then, there was no man whom he could not make to look like a child batting with a pencil… Slim and angular, he was a sad-eyed executioner.”The statistics of Parker’s career after 1919 might initially strain the belief of the 21st century cricket lover. In every season from 1920 until his retirement in 1935 he took over a hundred wickets; in each of the three seasons plumb in the middle of the 1920s he picked up over two hundred. In 1925 he took five wickets in an innings and ten in a match more often than Simon Harmer, a very fine current bowler, has managed in his entire career. But such facts burst out from Parker’s career like clothes from an over-filled cupboard. He took five wickets in an innings 227 times and ten in a match on 91 occasions. “He wasted nothing,” wrote Crusoe, “to every ball some stroke had to be offered; and there was Walter Hammond roaming, predatory, at very short slip.”Parker was shrewd enough to choose the Yorkshire game for his benefit in 1922 and then skilful enough to take 9 for 36 in his opponents’ first innings. During the course of that 10.2-over spell he hit the stumps with five successive deliveries, one of which was a no-ball. That sequence included his first hat-trick; two years later he managed three in the same season, including two in the home game against Middlesex, a match Gloucestershire won after being bowled out for 31 in the first innings. (Hammond chipped in with 174 not out in the second dig.) Parker bowled a total of 7719 maidens; James Anderson, a great modern bowler, has so far delivered 8317.5 overs Having taken 467 wickets in nine seasons before 1914 Parker picked up another 2811 after the war until a modest return of 108 wickets at 26.04 in 1935 convinced him it was time to retire. He was 52.The consensus of Parker’s fellow professionals was that on a damp pitch he was the best bowler in the country and on a dry one he was merely among the top three or four. He was unfortunate that the first decade of his spin-bowling career overlapped with Wilfred Rhodes’ last and also unfortunate that his latter seasons coincided with Hedley Verity in his pomp. The very shrewd Bob Wyatt thought him a less dangerous bowler when attacked. “You had to know how to play him,” Wyatt said. “Move down the wicket…and hit the ball over his head. It could affect him. His next delivery might be short, then.”Parker’s great liking for damp English wickets and the availability of other slow bowlers offers an explanation as to why he was not selected for any MCC tours but it is scarcely a satisfactory one. Crusoe was certainly having none of it: “the silly saying went that Parker could not bowl on a plumb pitch; as if so great an artist were a sort of one-pitch man, like some elder who must occupy but one certain chair in the room, and if that be taken, cannot sit down at all.” What defied conventional comprehension, then as now, was that Parker was selected for only one home Test and that he was not picked when conditions suited him perfectly.

Parker’s hands were trembling, and for several seconds it seemed possible he was going to give one of the game’s most eminent men a punch up the bracket

He certainly believed playing for Gloucestershire didn’t help his cause. Even when naming him as one of ‘s Cricketers of the Year, Sydney Pardon confessed: “I have seen so little of Parker that I can say little about his bowling from personal observation.” Yet in 1922, the season for which he was honoured, Parker had taken 206 wickets. One can imagine Charlie bridling in resentment at the editor’s admission before ascribing such ignorance to the fact that he played at least half his games in Bristol, Gloucester and Cheltenham.Other occasions offered him perfect opportunities to publicise his deep grievance. At the county’s annual dinner in February 1926 he was presented with a trophy to mark his achievement in taking 17 for 56 in the match against Essex the previous season. Earlier the same evening Pelham Warner, the principal guest and an England selector, had spoken of his country’s chances against Australia in the forthcoming Ashes series. As recorded by David Foot in Parker concluded his acceptance speech by saying that “the selection committee would do well not to overlook some of the players in the less fashionable counties”.No one could argue the barb was out of character. Parker had a good mind and he frequently spoke it, particularly on his favourite topics: music, politics and cricket. Sometimes the last two subjects could be combined. Foot’s typically fine essay, which itself is based on a series of conversations with his subject’s team-mates and opponents, records several occasions when Parker had execrated the unearned privilege in which inter-war English cricket was soaked. Annual dinners like that held at Bristol’s Grand Hotel were a perfect example of an occasion when the dividing line between cricket’s officers and men was very clear. More often than not, the amateurs were placed with the guests of honour and the county’s officials. The professionals sat together and drank their beer.Five months after that dinner England’s players gathered at Leeds for the third Ashes Test. The first two matches had been drawn and all the signs were that the unprotected sections of the Headingley pitch would be wet, “marshy” the called them. They were classic Charlie Parker conditions and there was little surprise he was among the 12 players picked for the game. There was, though, astonishment when he was omitted from the team and disbelief when the England captain, Arthur Carr, then opted to bowl first. Australia made 492 and the game was eventually drawn. The England selectors for that series were Arthur Gilligan, Percy Perrin and Pelham Warner.Charlie Parker•Hulton Archive/Getty Images”Leaving out Parker at Headingley in 1926 was the most extraordinary mistake in all Test history,” concluded Wyatt, who was himself to omit Parker from his own England side at The Oval in 1930. “If it was thought proper to invite him to the ground, it was an act of lunacy not to play him when you had decided to put the opposition in because it was a wet wicket,” wrote Alan Gibson.Charlie Parker rarely forgot a batsman’s weakness and he never forgot a slight. In April 1929 Warner attended Gloucestershire’s annual dinner once again. Once the formal proceedings had ended Parker went to the lift with his team-mate and close friend, Reg Sinfield. The pair were hoping to take some fresh air on one of the balconies. Suddenly an obsequious lift attendant announced that room should be made for “Mr Pelham Warner”, who was approaching the lift and wished to go up to his room. Let us allow David Foot to take up the story:”Parker flung his arms out and grasped Warner by the lapels. ‘I’ll never once in my life make way for that bugger. He’s never had a good word to say for me. This so-and-so has blocked my Test match career. I played once in 1921 – and he made sure I’d never play for England again. He even got me up to Leeds in 1926 and then left me out. Make way for him…? Mr Bloody Warner will go to bed when I’ve finished with him.'”Foot admits that he has heard various versions of the story but none that contradicted its basic elements. (He even toned down some of the language.) Parker’s hands were trembling. For several seconds it seemed possible he was going to give one of the game’s most eminent men a punch up the bracket.”Come on, Charlie. Tisn’t worth it,” said Sinfield. Parker released his grip.Cricket’s historians might do well to pay more attention to Charlie Parker but it would be fatuous to turn him into either a paragon or a martyr. He was sharp-tempered, irascible and quick to criticise other fielders while being fairly inept himself. And for all that he might have argued about politics his career displays the conventional characteristics of the inter-war professional. He admired some of Gloucestershire’s amateur captains – Bev Lyon is a good example – and his benefit brought him £1075 (worth about £50,000 today). After retirement he served the game as a first-class umpire and then as a coach at Cranleigh School. Yet he remains one of the most intriguing characters from an age when the English professional cricketer was notable for his silent deference. And on a warm afternoon at Nevil Road it is wonderfully easy to imagine that rhythmic approach to the crease as Charlie wreaked quiet havoc in the only republic he ever knew. Odd Men In

Talking Points: Why did Ben Stokes open the batting for Royals, but bowl only one over?

Also: What was the thinking behind the Sunrisers’ super slow start with the bat?

Matt Roller11-Oct-2020Tewatia’s lucky break: the bails stay in their grooveDuring the Royals’ chase, Rahul Tewatia defied convention by deciding to attack Rashid Khan’s last over, the 18th, when most batsmen this season have opted to see him off and protect their wicket. He started by reverse-heaving two boundaries before flaying another over the covers. But when he then aimed to cut, he bottom-edged into wicketkeeper Jonny Bairstow’s pad.The ball then ricocheted into the stumps with Tewatia out of his crease, leaving him to rue what appeared to be an unfortunate stumping. But after the zing bails lit up, they landed back in their groove to give him a valuable reprise. It brought to mind the storm surrounding the bails in the 2019 World Cup, when they failed to be dislodged five times in the first two weeks of the tournament.The non-dismissal proved crucial, too, with Tewatia and Parag sealing the win with a ball to spare after adding 85 between them in 7.5 overs for the sixth wicket.Why did Ben Stokes open the batting?For the second time in the IPL and the sixth time in his T20 career, Ben Stokes opened the batting for the Royals – as had been mooted on ESPNcricinfo’s Stump Mic podcast and by Tom Moody in our T20 Time:Out pre-match show.The move didn’t work – he chopped on against Khaleel Ahmed for five – but there was plenty of logic behind it. Stokes has struggled in the middle order over the last two years, struggling to get started against spinners in the middle overs – since the start of the 2018 season, he has scored at a strike rate of 116.57 and averaged 18.16 against spin in the IPL. It also meant the Royals had a left-right opening combination, and in theory meant that Buttler should have been more free to play his shots, with Stokes the slower starter of the two and more likely to anchor the innings.Having already made more changes than any other side in the tournament, the Royals will be reluctant to switch things around too much despite Stokes’ failure. This was Stokes’ first professional game for two months, coming immediately after his quarantine period, and was only his fourth white-ball appearance since the World Cup final in July 2019 – the fact that the move didn’t work on this occasion should not mean that it is canned for good.Royals’ powerplay strugglesIn their first game of the season, the Royals made 54 for 1 in the first six overs, and followed that up with 69 for 1 in their second. But in their last five, they have managed 185 runs in 30 powerplay overs while losing 12 wickets, and have been the IPL’s worst team in the first six overs. Today, they managed 36 for 3 and again seemed to be batting frenetically: perhaps the looming spectre of Rashid in the second half of the innings meant they felt they had to make the most of the fielding restrictions.ESPNcricinfo LtdTheir struggles have partly been down to Buttler and Steven Smith’s poor form, but also due to an unsettled batting line-up: Stokes and Buttler was their fourth different opening combination of the season, and their longest opening stand lasted only 2.4 overs. As a result, it seems unlikely that they will want to switch things around again, and will instead bank on their three overseas batsmen to come good at the top of the order.What was behind Sunrisers’ slow start?Despite only losing one wicket, the Sunrisers started very slowly, finishing the powerplay on 26 for 1: it was the joint third-lowest six-over score this IPL season, and the first time a team had only managed two boundaries in the powerplay.Why? Knowing how reliant their openers are on Bairstow and David Warner’s opening partnership, the Royals decided to frontload, giving their two best bowlers – Jofra Archer and Shreyas Gopal – two overs each with the new ball. They hit their straps, meaning Warner and Bairstow decided to drop anchor and eke out only 13 runs from the first four.When Kartik Tyagi came into the attack to bowl the third over, Bairstow had little option but to free his arms and look to make use of the fielding restrictions. He cracked him for two twos and a six, but then mistimed a pull and was caught in the deep, rewarding Smith’s aggressive captaincy move.Is Warner Archer’s bunny?Six innings, 41 balls, five dismissals: that is Warner’s head-to-head record against Archer in 2020. He gave him a torrid time in Australia’s T20I and ODI series in England, bowling high pace, and did similarly with the new ball today, bowling only one slower ball across his first two overs. Today’s dismissal was a little different, and Warner was cleaned up while backing away and looking to flay over the off side, but extended his poor run against Archer. As below, it also earned him a new console.

Kane Williamson: T20 finisher?Two games in a row, the Sunrisers’ top order has laid a platform for their middle order: against the Kings XI, they lost their first wicket in the 16th over; today, they lost their second in the 15th.On both occasions, the Sunrisers’ approach has led to questions about Kane Williamson’s role in their side. He has been listed to bat at No. 4, with Manish Pandey ahead of him performing an anchoring role, but their plan for the openers to bat far into the innings has left Williamson’s name looking somewhat out of place as a finisher with Mohammad Nabi and Fabian Allen both sitting on the bench.But he has shown glimpses of his power game at the death in both games, with 20* off 10 against the Kings XI and 22* off 12 in this afternoon’s match. While he has shown his ability to adapt to an unfamiliar role, the fact that Williamson has only faced 66 balls across five innings this season seems like something for the Sunrisers think-tank to address.Should Stokes have bowled more?Stokes only bowled one over, which went for seven runs, with Tewatia bowling his full allocation and conceding 13 from his final over, the 16th. That might have been due to Stokes’ poor record with the ball since joining the Royals – average 35.64, economy 9.10 – or with a view to easing him back towards full match fitness: in his two most recent Tests for England, he bowled a total of four overs due to concerns about his quad muscle.Either way, it seems likely that Stokes’ role with the ball this season will resemble Andre Russell’s for KKR: bowling short, sharp spells at crucial junctures rather than being one of their main options.

Game
Register
Service
Bonus